Archive for the ‘Grand Designs’ Category

GDL08: Shed special

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

As a special treat for Alex over at Shedworking, I thought I’d take a quick look at some of the sheds on offer at Grand Designs Live last week.

GlassPod

This GlassPod is the same glass structure that was included in the Grand Village. It’s incredibly sleek, providing lovely views of your garden or the countryside (if you have such a view), but I felt very exposed when I was inside it, like a goldfish in a bowl. I can imagine that if you don’t have the room to give this a lot of clear space around it, it could end up being very ugly. And of course, glass is a two-edged sword: If you can see out you can see in, so anything you put in here is going to be on view to the world. Probably not ideal for shedworking.

Jorntrahus outside

Jorntrahus inside

This Jörnträhus shed has a classic Scandinavian design, all warm wood with a sauna-esque feel. Add some gingham curtains, though, and I’d be forever waiting for Heidi to pop her head out of the door and ask if I want some goats cheese (and yes, I know Heidi was Swiss!). Stylistically, I’m not sure how a shed like this would fit into the English landscape or with most English architecture. If you’re building a log cabin, then perhaps you could get away with this in your garden, but it’s a bit clichéd for my taste.

Rooms Outdoor

Now on to the pièce de résistance, Rooms Outdoor and their, well, room outdoors. Not the cheapest of sheds, it has to be said (I can’t remember exactly how much it cost – I think it was around £16k), but the Haus+ certainly is a cut above the rest. It comes with a kitchenette and separate toilet, creating a space that is practical enough to work in all day, or to even carry a sofa bed if you want to use it as a guest room.

Sofas

The Haus+ had plenty of room to relax and work, and didn’t feel as cramped as the Jörnträhus did. Rooms Outdoor had their display kitted out more like a conservatory or second lounge than an office, but if you removed some of the furniture there’d be loads of space for mundane things like book shelves and filing cabinets, or whatever else you want in your office.

Workspace

Kitchenette

Having the kitchenette is a really nice touch – it makes the room just that little bit more self-sufficient, so you don’t have to keep trotting back and forth to your house if you want a cuppa. And of course, a loo is a very pragmatic and useful addition.

Loo

Indeed, I really loved the Haus+. I could imagine having one of these at the bottom of the garden, my little unwired escape pod where I could go to hide from the internet, read a book, maybe even write a book. All I need now is a garden to put it in.

GDL08: Building with green oak

Wednesday, May 14th, 2008

Even though Grand Designs Live finished on Sunday, I still have enough photos and thoughts for about another ten blog posts. One of the companies that I was very keen to talk to before the show ended was Carpenter Oak, who were demonstrating on the Traditional Build Techniques stand. If you’re a Grand Designs fan, you may have heard of Carpenter Oak (or their sister company, Carpenter Oak & Woodland) as they designed and built the timber frame for the beautiful Argyll house. The two companies used to be one, but diverged so that Carpenter Oak could specialise in new builds and Carpenter Oak & Woodland could focus on restoration work.

I absolutely love green oak framed buildings, with all the oak exposed and wonderful big double height spaces. Although I say that this blog is about finding out what sort of a house Kevin and I want to build, I will admit to a prior bias towards green oak. It’s beautiful, environmentally friendly, warm and full of personality – a much needed antidote to the soulless places I’ve lived for much of my life. So I was delighted to get the opportunity to talk to Glen, below on his shaving horse, about oak framed houses.

Carpenter Oak

In the first part, we discuss types of builds, spiders. how environmentally friendly green oak is, sustainability, where the oak comes from.

And in part two, Glen tells me about the frame they had on the stand, how much it costs and what its fate will be:

If I had the opportunity to build a green oak house tomorrow, I’d jump at it. For the moment, though, I can only dream.

GDL08: Sustainable energy

Monday, May 12th, 2008

Chair: Max Fraser
Speakers: Dr Douglas Parr (Greenpeace), Gary Freedman (Ecotricity), Stuart Motford (The Planning Portal)

Sustainable energy

Douglas Parr, Greenpeace
Have to see the energy system through lens of climate change; defining issue at the moment. If some of the not terribly wild predictions come to pass, ExCeL will be under water.

What do we need to do? Three pronged strategy: use energy more efficiently; use renewable energy; use decentralised energy, electricity generated close to point of use because then don’t lose all the power you currently do in transmission. When you do burn fossil fuels, you can use the heat you waste when you normally produce electricity and use it for the heat we need on an everyday basis. Isn’t it crazy that you have a boiler at home, but when we generate electricity in a power station we chuck away all that heat into cooling towers? Heat we waste in cooling towers pretty much matches the heat we need for housing in the UK. If we generated energy closer to where we needed, we’d be able to use that heat.

EfficienCity, brings some idea of reality to what it would be like to live in such an energy efficient, decentralised, renewable word. All sorts of examples on the city, e.g. a Brewery, hospital, leisure centre, as well as housing.

Video about combined heat and power (CHP) plant at Scottish & Newcastle Royal Brewery in Manchester – full details on website so I won’t transcribe the video here, just click on East Zone, then Brewery. But in short, the burnable waste from the brewery is used as fuel for the CHP plant. The scheme will reduce their carbon footprint by 87%.

There are working examples around the UK. This model illustrates examples from around the world, e.g. housing in Malmo, Sweden. These examples do exist and they show that even your average city can produce quote a lot of low and zero carbon energy.

But, once this energy goes outside your own building, [i.e. when selling back to the grid] it gets very complicated and difficult. If we want a low-carbon society, we need to make it much easier. The detail of why it’s so difficult, the market is very unfriendly for small producers, such as individual householders, and our political system is not giving much encouragement to individuals and businesses to do their bit.

Nothing illustrated this more than last week: the government has repeatedly promised smart metres that show what you are using for free. It’s been shown that if householders know which appliances use what energy, they’ll bring the bills down through switching appliances off.

But the government did a u-turn on basis that some technology might come out in the next few years that might be better. Not a tactic, you’ll note, we apply to healthcare or the classroom. But because this might have cost the utilities a bit of money, nothing happened. Political system has some way to go. But there is an opportunity to contribute to the decentralised energy money. Integrate efficiency and renewables with locally generated energy.

Gary Freedman, Ecotricity
Ecotricity is an energy supplier and generator that’s had a green energy tariff, since 1995. They supply clean energy, homes and businesses.

Most important area to talk about re: climate change is energy generation – single biggest emitter. People assume it’s cars or planes, but aviation is only 5% of what we emit. The largest is energy, and so the most important and urgent area to do something about.

When you think about cars, and people talk about battery cars – but how does that battery get charged up? Need more renewables. Two things to do – use less and change the way we generate energy.

Five key areas available:

1. Sun (solar photovoltaics and heating)
This means for homes, photovoltaics that generate electricity and solar hot water. PV is still pretty expensive and quite a long-term pay back, but prices are coming down quite dramatically. Solar hot water is quite economic payback in carbon debt terms and economically. But there’s also solar tower power, which is in the deserts of California and Spain, they get thousands of reflective mirrors which reflects the sun onto a water tank which heats up and boils, which drives an generator. Don’t require any cells, it’s all just mirrors.

2. Hydro (water)
People assume we should do more projects with hydro, but we don’t have any more large areas we can adopt this tech for in the UK. There are a number of smaller projects. It’s reliable, but difficult.

Wave – prototype but a lot of potential for the UK. Lots of wave energy we potentially have, but there are tough marine conditions.

Tidal – talk of barraging the Severn Estuary, could create 10% of UK’s energy, but environmental detriments are significant. So have environmentalists battling with each other, as there are negative impacts to wildlife.

3. Biomass
Means ‘burning stuff’. To make it work you need a source of stuff to burn, and if you’re in London we’re not really surrounded by suitable materials, so a bit limited, but in some ares of the UK and in the north of England and Scotland, it could become more and more relevant and realistic.

4. Ground source heat.
Mentioned Scandinavia, just by drilling a few feet you get to a very stable heat. done very efficiently in Sweden, not really done here in new dwellings. Some people are fighting the building industry about this because if we think about this as buildings are designed it’s more efficient, but can’t really retrofit.

5. Wind power
Very important to distinguish between large-scale wind – the big wind farms – and the small scale turbines that sit on your roof. Large-scale is proven, economic, very efficient, and the only large scale renewable tech that’s truly economic right now.

A few myths about wind:
- do wind turbines kill birds? Only if you put them in migratory paths, and that’s not allowed in the UK. Consult with English Nature, etc. and have no bird deaths in UK now
- noise – is actually very quite now
- intermittency – can have 20% of UK power from intermittent sources, and currently only 3%
- they are efficient
- TV reception – people think that it’s affected but it’s not.
- Carbon debt – people assume that because there’s concrete and metal that it’s not worth it environmentally. But carbon debt repaid in 3 – 6 months and will live for 30 years and at the end of that all that metal can be recycled.

What can businesses do? If a business wants to have renewable energy on their site but doesn’t know where to go, Ecotricity does all the up-front money, installs and maintains, and the company gets the electricity direct.

Ford – London’s first wind park, 2 in Dagenham. Were told that you can’t put wind turbines in a city, and so successful are putting a third up. These 2 turbines provide all electricity for the Dagenham plant.

M4, there’s a very visible turbine at the Prudential, near Reading.

What can individuals do? Probably more difficult, there’s no doubt that energy efficiency is important: using less power, smart meters, showing how much energy you’re using. But starting with something like solar hot-water is a good thing.

Stuart Mockford, CLG Planning Portal
Everything you’ve seen her so far needs planning permission. Planning Portal has something like 150 pages of information on it.

Before you do anything, you need to check what planning permissions etc. you need.

Three areas on the site: public, planing professionals, government users. In public area, is a section on greener homes. Then shows you information on where you can find information for what you need to do to submit a planning application.

One of the areas is micro-generation, i.e. home energy generation. Solar, thermal, small wind turbines, heat pumps, hydro. Site also includes case studies, about what people have experienced when putting these technologies in place. Lots of documents and info you can download.

Interactive House area which give information on what planning applications you need for each type of tech. Solar panels, for example, may not need planning permission but it does vary depending on type of panels and whether your house is listed, etc.

There’s also information on other measures you can take such as loft insulation, including insulation grants.

Site goes into quite a lot of details about what can be done, who’s done it before, and what planning people are likely to say. Good place to go before you spend any money, to make sure you don’t waste any.

Questions
Max: Doug, EfficienCity is an ideal scenario, lots of things that need to be done. Anything you’d prioritise?

Douglas: In some cases, CHP can actually be cheaper than conventional power generation, but it’s risky because there’s an up-front payment, but once it’s up and running it’s cheaper. In Southampton, for example, the central shopping centre is run on decentralised power and their bills are 10% cheaper. But current market models are unfriendly and expensive to set up. So first priority would be that for an urban centre. Under right framework it could be cheaper and easier still.

Max: Any uptake from the government.
Douglas: The government has recognised that local energy is good for the whole system. Even just electricity, on average we waste about 8% of our electricity in the wires connecting power stations to homes. In peak time, it’s about 20%. We have a lot of kit around Britain waiting to support peak power draw, and it’s not used the rest of the time. If energy is local, and don’t have to meet peak load on a national scale, because it’s all done locally, there are enormous savings. We’ve modelled that, by decentralising, we can lower carbon emissions, cheaper, and more secure because we save on fuel. This can save the country money, but from the point of the person putting this in, we don’t see that saving.

Max: Nuclear?
Douglas: We’re very antinuclear.

Gary: We’re with Greenpeace. A fraction of the money they are proposing to put into a nuclear power plant, we could easily put that into renewables and the output would overtake the amount we get from nuclear.

Max: Why don’t they get it?
Gary: The nuclear lobby is very powerful. Government said that they want renewables, but they planners don’t allow it, so the government can say they tried it and it didn’t work.

Max: Attitude of planners?
Stuart: Planners more interested in reducing power usage, also in favour of local generation, but there’s no silver bullet. One augments the other. Help people reduce use and save money, e.g. by providing grants for insulation. And also by reducing spinning reserve, where generators are just spinning, waiting for this demand to come. A of of kit just waiting to meet this demand, and trying to spread that demand and load that we want to think about. If you’re generating some electricity yourself, you’re demand on this spinning load is less, because you need less. So saving power, cutting emissions, and saving money.

Max: Wind turbines, beauty or eyesore?
Gary: We’re beyond that argument because wind is proven, the environmental and economic benefits are proven. Something like 70% of people in most surveys are in favour, the nimby attitude is overdone, we get a lot of positive reaction. Surveys after wind turbines installed increases to 90% in favour. It’s more perception of change. I don’t like look of pylons, but we accept them as something we must have.

Max: What sort of costs are we talking about in terms of implementing renewables, such as solar panels, or wind turbines or ground source?
Gary: Solar hot water is a couple of grand, solar PV, lots more expensive, for a 1kw system, which will produce 1/3 or 1/4 of your needs, costs £10,000, and can get 50% grants.

Max: How do you get grants?
Energy Savings Trust, through the government.

Douglas: In Germany it’s much cheaper, they have much more positive policy framework which is driving costs down.

Max: Wind turbines on a large scale are effective. What about smaller ones? Are they effective?
Stuart: If you have a wind turbine on it’s own, the payback time from savings can take a long time on its won. Some people talk about 18 months – 2 years. Carbon footprint of manufacture also important. But if you tie it in with solar hot water or PV solar, then those combined can provide significant savings.

Douglas: Were considering wind turbines, but need an assessment of wind resources. some urban locations really aren’t suitable. Some are, will get reasonable generation, but make sure you know what you’re dealing with in your place.

Stuart: Yes, on Bodmin Moor, you might get a payback in 6 months, but in Middlesex might be two years.

Max: Microgeneration within the home, you’re producing electricity and power of your own, and you can sell it back to the grid.
Gary: Yes, there are two things you can get – one is the price for the energy, also price for a Renewable Obligation Certificate, so for 1000 kw hrs, you get about £40. Energy costs are increasing so payback is improving. Energy’s gone up about 30% in the last year, so becoming more economic.

Questions from floor.
Q: How much difference would the feed-in tariff system make?

Gary: David Cameron thinks it will, we think it’s a bit late. The ROC system works well for developers, but it’s the planning system that’s difficult. Has been very successful in Germany. Large scale, don’t need it, let’s focus on planing; for micro-renewables, people need help, it’s unaffordable, and don’t see why it’s so hard to get the grant, and it costs us more than in Germany.

Max: Is rather embarrassing that our government is not offering enough incentive. In France, renewables are tax free.

Q: Went to Sweden and was fascinated to see they had 3 wind turbines in each village. Everyone was supportive of those three turbines here, wish we could introduce that in this country. Where do you get a comparison between cost/energy provided by various items that are available, e.g. PV vs. solar panels, wind etc.
Douglas: One place to go would be the Micropower Council, whether they do that in a convenient form, not sure but most likely to know. Or Renewable Energy Association, but are really an industry association for medium scale producers.

Max: Or Renewable Energy Centre. Centre for Alternative Technologies, or Energy Savings Trust. But every manufacturer for wind has a power curve and would take that with a pinch of salt, because it doesn’t include turbulence, wind sheer, etc.. With solar, have to think about maintenance, cleaning, whether your roof faces the right direction. Individual circumstances will affect how well your house does.

Stuart: Huge number of factors that affect efficiency, but taking all of that into account, should be able to publish information on which is the best for different envinronments, but that’s very subjective. It needs an independent party with means of measuring, someone like Which? or equivalent of that.

Max: The Swedish have always embraced these things, it’s a cultural thing. In the UK we have a strange attitude to change, we think the government’s not doing enough but when change does happen, lots of people grumble. Needs a change in mindset, and we should lobby government like crazy. We’ve got a new Mayor of London, who doesn’t have the best rack record regarding carbon and the environment, so let’s give him a kick up the backside!

GDL08: Lots left to blog

Sunday, May 11th, 2008

One of the things about spending so much time out and about at Grand Designs Live is that I’ve gathered more photos and information than I can reasonably blog in the time left over at the end of each day! So whilst GDL is over, this blog’s coverage of it is not. There’ll be lots, lots more to come over the next couple of weeks as I sort out photos, more video, and various other bits and pieces for your delectation and delight.

Meantime, thanks again to Midnight Communications, without whom I would have had just one day to cover what is really an enormous exhibition that deserves a lot more attention than I could possibly have given it in a day. Thanks too to everyone that I spoke to, who let me shove a mobile phone in their face, or who patiently answered my questions. I had a blast, and I can’t wait for the next one!

GDL08: Sustainable Communities

Sunday, May 11th, 2008

Chair: Kevin McCloud
Speakers: Colin Butfield (WWF), Pooran Desai (Bioregional Quintain), Sue Clifford (Common Ground)

Kevin McCloud
Our speakers represent the top of the tree of sustainable development. I’ll introduce them in a moment. I’m myself trying to build a sustainable development in Swindon, and it’s interesting how, when we talk about sustainable development, it’s less about the houses and it’s more about other things – the spaces in between the houses and how we live, but changing lifestyle is controversial, smacks of social and political engineering. People resent the idea of making us individuals pay for the crimes of greedy capitalists, but it is our own lifestyles which drive the need for all of these things: consumption of new goods, holidays abroad, and all the things that manufacturers make for us which we consume.

Kevin McCloud

Increasingly we’re finding, in order to make a community sustainable you need to do a lot of things that aren’t about development, such as creating play spaces, thinking about food transport and car sharing. You want to make a place that people want to move to and not leave. Make places which are distinctive and powerful and that’s a key thing, local distinctiveness is a key component of sustainability – nowhere will be sustainable unless people want to stay there and put something back into that place.

Kevin McCloud

Three people here today represent the most important strands,

Colin Butfield, responsible for a campaign that started in WWF and is now the One Planet Living campaign. They published a book called The Little Guide to One Planet Living, sets out an agenda for sustainable living, saying that sustainability is about increasing choice, creating circumstances where people have more choice and quality of life is increased.

That book was written by our second guests, Pooran Desai, who founded Bioregional Quintain, who coppice woods and create charcoal for people like B&Q. Therefore no excuse for buying Chinese charcoal, 50k tons brought into this world from China and Africa. Whereas we have lots of coppiced woods that need an income.

Finally, Sue Clifford, who founded a charity called Common Ground. We first met 20 years ago when they talked about colour and the way that changes across a country and can be used for cultural mapping. Since then Common Ground have gone on to create Apple Day, which celebrates apples, orchards, cider, etc, and have produced a wall chart of local distinctiveness, peculiarities. Sue has also published a book called England In Particular, book of English living, very funny and amusing read about what makes village life different.

Colin Butfield, WWF
Setting out the big picture. Why do we need to talk about sustainability? Why do we need to think about this? What is WWF doing about all this?

Suicide for a Sunday afternoon is to put up two graphs. Core of WWF’s science is the Live Planet Index. Measured biodiversity – everything in the oceans, forests, etc. That’s been steadily plummeting since the 70s. The other graph is humanities ecological footprint, the stuff we buy, pollution, materials we consume, very clear correlation between the two. So what can we do about it? how can we change that trend? Increase biodiversity.

Colin Butfield

What’s the point? We live in the UK, a tiny island. Surely it’s all India and China. If everyone lived like we do in the UK, we’d need 3 planets to support us, but in India or China, they need less than one planet. But every time we buy something from China, we have to remember they are exporting most of their stuff to us, and that’s why they are building one coal fired power station every week.

We talk about sustainability, and we talk about insulation and building materials, but that’s not all there is. Climate change is having real impact on the ground. One of the last tiger habitats is the Sunderbans, mangrove swamps, and 10ks of people live there, and sea level rise has made some of the islands uninhabitable, and the tigers are either coming in to conflict with people, or starving because they are having problem hunting.

In the UK, 27% of the impact we have on climate change comes from our homes.

Borneo forest cover in 1900 is almost 100% covered by forest. Still mostly in 1950, but by 2005 there’s more than half of it gone – one of the oldest forests in the world. That’s resources not just for people, but home to one of the last great apes, the orangutang. A lot of this is about timber, palm oil production and illegal logging.

50% of all timber is used in our homes, if it is sustainable that’s great, but we are the third largest importer of illegal timber, so need to be very, very careful about sourcing timber.

All of us as individuals could bring UK needs down to about 2 planets, the rest of the impact comes down to stuff where only communities or government can make a difference. Issues around power sources, or lack of public transport. So 50% of what we can do is for the individual, the rest is community.

It’s also not the same from place to place. The South East has the highest impact per capita. There are graphs of housing, travel and food footprints. So in the South West, very low travel footprint, but very high in the South West, same with food.

Example of homes in the UK. Looked at over 90 different types of houses. If you start with a rural detached house, has an initial power etc. bill of £1393, and if we reduce carbon emissions by 80%, then we’re looking at stuff very easy and cheap to fix – draught proofing, insulation, changing light bulbs. These will actually save you money. If you install a ground source heat pump, which can do more to save energy, that’s around £11k of a spend, but that can be quite a barrier for most people. So WWF working with government and local authorities, to help more people afford to do it.

Lobbying government to create a low interest loan over 20 years, e.g. £700 per year, which is about the amount of money you’d save having done all the insulation etc., so after 10 years you’re quids in. Can help by lobbying MPs and talk to local council about it.

What communities can do is stuff like BedZED car club, individuals can act together and find ways to save CO2. Community hubs such as schools can also be key, so WWF has produced over 200 publications for schools to help them understand how they can help and become sustainable.

Local councils typically get spoken to about broken paving stones and holes in the road, but have started to be lobbied about climate change, people asking what the council is doing to improve things for individuals, to help them reduce their footprints. So there is the Beacon Award, WWF Climate Change category. Lots of initiatives – all it takes to make it happen is for people to talk to the council and point them at the WWF resources.

Scale of challenge is huge, but individual action makes a difference, community action makes a bigger difference, and working with the local council can make a massive difference. Have a foot print calculator online to help people understand where they can make changes.

Pooran Desai, Bioregional Quintain
Polar bears are struggling to retain their homes. Why should we worry? We do face a massive challenge, and we don’t have three planets to support us. How can we create a high quality lifestyle, but be sustainable?

BedZED is a dev of 100 homes, plus office space and community space. Thermally efficient, good insulation, generating some renewable energy. Photovoltaic panels integrated into conservatory glazing. So without any real change in behaviour, just by building sustainably, you can save about half a planet.

Pooran Desai

Just through switching off lights when we don’t use them we can save another 30%. Creating a car club too, need access for key journeys, but the rest of the journeys you can walk, cycle or use public transport. People who live at BedZED can sell their cars, and yet still have all their car needs met by up to about £10 per week, whereas owning one costs up to £100 per week.

So does this mean social engineering, but I’d say that if you live in a sprawling suburb, you can’t walk to the local shops, you have to drive, you can’t get to your school by cycling, so we have engineered a very eco-unfriendly lifestyle. And now there is such little exercise in our everyday lives, 60% of all men are going to be obese within 30 years. Creating communities that are less car dependent are good for the environment and good for our own health, and if we’re healthier we’re happier, so low car development = happy.

BedZED made recycling easier by integrating recycling into the home, and use recycled materials. New developments include a drop off point for bulk organic food, making food boxes more cost-effective, offer boxes at 15% less because don’t have to deliver door to door. Can design into our future communities.

Talking about this as a developer, but all these ideas can be incorporated when you’re building your own home, so one of the things you should think about is where is it located? Can you reduce your car use, or become a member of a car club, or walk or cycle more?

It’s relatively easy to reduce your footprint by about a half at BedZED, but soon as you leave BedZED, you’re back to a non-sustainable office, school etc. So need to encourage more people to improve their footprint.

One Brighton has apartments that will be ready spring next year, has rooftop mini-allotments, renewable developments, completely car free, next to Bright station, so there will be a car club.

Up to seven stories now, using greenest concrete using 100% recycled aggregate, 50% green cement. Trying to encourage more developers to use this standard of concrete, using a lot of reclaimed materials.

Main building material is low-temp clay block, uses 50% less energy, so will see more of that.

Also want to start a mini sky farm using chickens in an “egg-loo”, but although it won’t produce a lot of eggs, it will put children back in touch with nature.

Largest scheme is Middlesborough, zero waste strategy, renewable energy. Whole landscape is planted out to orchard, edible landscaping, For first time in 30 – 40 years, we’re talking about food sourcing, so producing local food reduces footprint.

Sue Clifford, Common Ground
Common Ground, hardly ever mention sustainability, and would define it as living together, not just us, but living well with nature. Sustainability is seeking a new mutuality with us and nature. Worked hard to think of ways to stand up for their everyday surroundings, build new bridges as well as keeping the old ones open.

Common Place, unless we look after the ordinary, the special will become lost, fragmented, meaningless.

Sue Clifford

People value all sorts of things about their own surroundings. People focus on all the things that go to make a place special. Be wrong to think that looking at your parish is parochial, the connections are out and beyond the parish. There are people doing parish maps and ABCs of local distinctiveness all over the world, e.g. one in Italy, which includes everything from local ravioli to history of bandits

Every county used to have a gate pattern, kerb stones had something to say. All these little corners have different meanings for people. Assertions:

- Local – parish, street, blog, you’re own self-defined feeling
- Knowledge about a place, upon that they build their values, so if a place loses its meaning, people’s affection for it is degraded and they cease to care.

Water used to be revered, with well dressing thanking whoever for the fact that water is still running. Place names tell like Wells or Bath say how important water is. And through each of hour homes runs rivulets [albeit in pipes].

Localness is about differentiation. Dialect, accent.

Different places have different breeds of livestock, e.g. a Hampshire Downs sheep ad a Wensleydale sheep are different.

Standards not standardisation. Quality doesn’t mean everything has to be the same. Bus shelters, are all different, some of them proper buildings, have their own personality, can shout the place and often do better if they do.

Also looking at the way in which place accommodates and accumulates change. Enriching the feeling of a place. Building out of local materials isn’t just about reducing journey they have made, but also keeping local culture going.

Part of what we are is an incredible mixture of identities.

Demand the best of the new. So often we aspire low, and yet we can have it all if we really care about it Norwich library and it’s relationship with the church outside.

Apples. One of the things that excited us is that we can grow 3000 varieties of apples here, including cider, dessert and cooking apples. Many come from place and have stories attached to them, come from orchards that maintain a great richness of biodiversity. And also they maintain buildings, such as cider houses and fruit stores. Plus there’s the games, customs, celebrations.

Let nature into our every day surroundings, very close to us. One thing we’ve been advocating for a long time are community orchards, now only where people can enjoy a sunny day but also grow their own food. Various community orchards making their own juices and ciders. Apple day.

Although our everyday surroundings are ours, we are part of a much bigger picture.

Sustainable Communities

Kevin
As a keen cider drinker I endorse every word.

Question: Where can we find the most successful new neighbourhoods?
Kevin
: I know there are some good ones in Germany.

Pooran: I’d like to suggest BedZED as an example. Most interesting stat is that after a survey in July, average BedZED resident knows 20 neighbours, average in UK is 3. Key things around that has been reducing car use, there are fewer cars, and no cars allowed within centre of development, so that’s a place where children play and parents meet each other. It’s that sort of local, social fabric which we’ve lost, and nothing has destroyed that more than the car, so we have a very hopeful story, because cars are not good for the environment.

Kevin: There are examples of sustainable construction, Greenwich Millennium Village, but they’re not necessarily e.g.s of sustainable communities. Pooran hasn’t mention the reed bed sewerage system etc. because it’ all about people. There’s a place in Germany where the residents had a say in some of the design, and there are more e.g. in Germany and Holland than here.

Colin: An inspiring example. Woman from a town in Devon convinced whole town to go plastic-bag-free and get people to think about their resource use, but what was impressive is that she just decided that it mattered, so she talked to her community and got them engaged, and because of that they’ve now started car clubs, people know each other better now, it’s a closer community and people know each other better.

Kevin: Sue, have you seen communities that are better rooted? More aware of their local communities? E.g. west country or Norfolk.

Sue: It’s difficult because you can find examples of both extremes in the south west, or wherever. One of the things that strikes me is that the use of the car has so deprived people of their company. Thinking of Milton Keynes, the whole idea of the city was based around the car, the car was king and to see things come right round to BedZED is so positive. What I would say is that it takes one or two things, as in Modbury and the plastic bags, is that what we’ve seen with the community orchard is that it’s starting it off, it’s breaking down the fear people have about talking across boundaries to each other about what they care about. And once they get going very little stops them and I think that there are lots of very positive movement all over the country. A lot of action about the allotments, and because they know and trust each other because of the allotments, they do a lot more. To begin where you are and take a step, make a move and not be frightened. Otherwise one is so daunted by taking a move. Just begin where you are and make the smallest of differences. All the differences we’re all trying to make are beginning to make up and cause a wave now, something is happening.

GDL08: The best massaging machine I’ve ever experienced

Friday, May 9th, 2008

I have a pretty dodgy back which has been prone to problems for the majority of my life, so I’m really very keen on things like chiropractic and massage, whether sports or shiatsu. Indeed, one of the items on our wedding list that Kevin and I were surprised to receive was a machine you place on your chair and which then gives you a massage. It feels lovely, but compared to the one I’ve just experienced… well, that’s the difference between “stuff you can put on a wedding list someone might actually buy” and “stuff you’d need some sort of unexpected inheritance to afford”.

The woman who encouraged me to try this massage table used the time that I was lying there to give me the full sales pitch, which in all honesty wasn’t that sales-y. The company that designed and builds it are apparently a medical company, so there was a lot of information about how the machine can help relax and improve the condition of your muscles, and can even break up any blood clots that you might have skulking about.

Biocomfort massager

All very impressive, but what really got my attention was the fact that just 5 – 10 minutes on the Relaxo-Comfort, by German company Biocomfort, wiped out days of backache. I’ve spent three out of the last four days walking round ExCeL with my laptop, charger, digital SLR, two mobile phones and various other bits of kit. Even with my very comfortable Crumpler backpack for the laptop, my back has been really achy and painful. Yet a short massage from the Biocomfort certainly eased the ache more than I would have expected from simply lying down.

So I’m completely sold on the idea, even if I have nowhere to put a Biocomfort, nor the money to buy one (I don’t remember how much it cost, my head can’t hold figures over £1000…). Never mind – it definitely goes into the “things we’d like in our house” category!

GDL08: Facit and the House That Kevin Built

Friday, May 9th, 2008

It’s been really interesting watching Kevin McCloud build his house from straw bales, vertical thatch and, for the upper floor and roof, the Facit building system. I was lucky enough to bump into Andrew Goodeve and Bruce Bell from Facit at the Grand Village, so of course, we had a chat:

GDL08: Building with cob

Friday, May 9th, 2008

Cob is a very eco-friendly and cheap building material, as I found out on Wednesday when I spoke to cob building expert, Kate Edwards. As with straw bales, I was surprised to find out that cob buildings are very long lasting and can be more than one storey tall – indeed, there is an example of a ten storey building that is over a thousands years old!

One of the nice things about cob is that for most people, they can source the material locally, from their own foundations. I chatted to Kate about that, and about the process of building cob buildings:

And then Kate gave me a demonstration, showing me how to insert windows into a cob building, and discussing the merits of the cob pizza oven:

I took a lot of photos, which I’ll post up here later, but in the meantime, here’s my Grand Designs Live photo set.

GDL08: Building with straw bales

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Stand B130 in the Grand Build section of Grand Designs Live is possibly my favourite part of the entire exhibition. It features companies that build with straw bales, cob, and timber frame makers. I spent quite a bit of time on the stand yesterday, talking to about building out of straw and cob.

Amazonails is a company that offers designs, advice, consultancy and training in the use of straw bales in construction and Sophie walked me through some of the concepts involved. We spoke firstly about how straw bales are a structural building material, which surprised me no end. You can build entirely out of straw bales without needing a wooden frame to hold the building up.

We then talked about how you render the bales, with line on the outside and clay on the inside.

This is an example of the clay render:
Straw bales with a clay renderAnd the lime render:
Straw bales with a lime renderWith a lovely example of pargetting, or sculpting in lime plaster:
Pargetting in lime renderAnd finally, how do you build a straw bale wall? It’s actually very simple.

Here are the stakes that hold the bale in place:Stakes for holding bales in placeAnd essential equipment for tidying up the bales, which apparently get a bit ‘hairy’ when freshly laid, and for sculpting rounded corners:Trimming

For me, straw bale building is an exciting idea. It’s very cheap, very easy, incredibly green, and you can do a lot of it yourself. Amazonails do training courses, so you can learn how straw bale building works before embarking on your own project.

GDL08: Eco Hab – video

Wednesday, May 7th, 2008

A quick look round the Eco Hab house. I wanted to take a more detailed look, but it was a bit busy.